**FEB 2020**
Our Speakers:
Dr.
Robert Olsen, Professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering from WSU spoke about the technology & assumed safety.
Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences from WSU spoke about the biological impact of wireless technology and the outdated current FCC guidelines.
More information was found at the Gonzaga Conference Center Events Page.
Event ran from 4:00pm-7:20pm
- :00 - :06 Opening Remarks
- :06 - 1:10 Dr. Robert Olsen, professor Emeritus of Electrical Engineering from WSU, on the 5G technology.
- 1:10 - 1:21 Q&A with Dr. Robert Olsen
- 1:21 - 1:28 Break
- 1:28 - 1:32 Environmental Health Trust Video Presentation
- 1:33 - 3:02 Dr. Martin Pall, Professor Emeritus of Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences from WSU and prominant critic of 5G technology's potential biological impact.
- 3:02 - 3:18 Q&A with Dr. Martin Pall
Link to Dr. Pall's Slides from the Wireless & 5G Forum. Please, always give Dr. Pall Credit.
For more information Email Spokane Wired
Part II : Dr. Martin Pall
Dr. Pall's Slides from the Wireless & 5G Forum.
Part I : Dr. Robert Olsen
Spokane Wired Take-Away from the Wireless & 5G Forum:
As was made abundantly clear by our first speaker, Dr. Robert Olsen, the FCC and the ICNIRP do not acknowledge that public exposure to non-ionizing radiation (like that from WiFi, cell phones, cell towers, smart meters, smart t.v., electromagnetic fields etc.), under the current exposure standards set by the FCC, affects biology in any way that would be considered a health hazard. Dr. Robert Olsen's specialization is Electrical Engineering, and naturally, since he is not a Biochemical or Medical Scientist, did not come prepared with cited scientific evidence that the ICNIRP and FCC use to maintain their positions on public safety. He has however provided the following for us from ICNIRP. Conversely, Dr. Martin Pall, our second speaker, whose specialties are Biochemistry and Basic Medical Sciences, presented clear cited evidence that non-ionizing radiation does indeed have non-thermal effects that negatively affect biology. Dr. Pall cited multiple studies to substantiate this claim and, in his view, proved that the current FCC safety standards are irrelevant in light of the scientific evidence of the mechanisms through which Wireless Radiation affects biology. All of the cited evidence can be found in Dr. Pall's Presentation Slides which he has provided to Spokane Wired to share with the public.
At Spokane Wired, we are alarmed that our regulatory agencies are allowing the public to be exposed to an increase of this radiation which is not proven safe. Furthermore, we are alarmed that the FCC and ICNIRP refuse to acknowledge recent scientific evidence such as that discovered in the 30 million dollar, tax payer funded, National Toxicology Report which found clear evidence of a cancer link with cell phone radiation. In light of their refusal to adjust their regulations accordingly, it is clear that these agencies cannot be trusted to work for the public whom they are hired to serve.
We recognize that since our regulatory bodies are not working to ensure that the public is safe, we, as citizens, must work together at the local level to protect ourselves and our communities from increased exposure to EMF and Wireless Radiation. We encourage our City Council to take this issue to heart, do their own study of the scientific evidence, as we have, and discover for themselves the dire need that we act locally to protect our communities.
